{"id":1117,"date":"2026-01-19T06:54:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-19T06:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/?p=1117"},"modified":"2026-01-19T06:54:01","modified_gmt":"2026-01-19T06:54:01","slug":"should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable\/","title":{"rendered":"Should require 100% burn-in testing or is sample testing acceptable?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-rank-math-toc-block\" id=\"rank-math-toc\"><h2>Table of Contents<\/h2><nav><ul><li><a href=\"#burn-in-testing\">Burn-in testing<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#100-burn-in-screening\">100% burn-in screening<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#sample-testing-and-aql-sampling\">Sample testing and AQL sampling<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#early-life-failures-infant-mortality-\">Early-life failures (infant mortality)<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#process-maturity-and-npi\">Process maturity and NPI<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#environmental-stress-screening-ess-hass-hasa\">Environmental stress screening (ESS), HASS, HASA<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#practical-scenarios-in-pcb-assembly\">Practical scenarios in PCB assembly<\/a><ul><li><a href=\"#medical-electronics-pcba\">Medical electronics PCBA<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#automotive-electronics-control-boards\">Automotive electronics control boards<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#industrial-control-and-embedded-systems\">Industrial control and embedded systems<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><a href=\"#decision-table-100-burn-in-vs-sample-testing\">Decision table: 100% burn-in vs sample testing<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#how-to-set-a-burn-in-plan-with-your-pcb-supplier\">How to set a burn-in plan with your PCB supplier<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#summary\">Summary<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>If you build electronics for OEMs, EMS partners, and brand owners, you\u2019ve heard this debate a thousand times: \u201cDo we really need to burn-in every unit?\u201d The honest answer is:&nbsp;<strong>it depends on risk, maturity, and what kind of failures you\u2019re trying to catch<\/strong>\u2014not on habit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At a&nbsp;<strong>China PCB B2B factory focused on fast prototyping and reliable assembly<\/strong>, you\u2019ll usually see both modes in the wild:&nbsp;<strong>100% screening for high-risk builds<\/strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<strong>sample-based screening once the line is stable<\/strong>. That\u2019s how teams protect field reliability without turning production into a bottleneck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you\u2019re new here, start with the site overview:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/\">China PCB B2B factory: fast prototyping, reliable assembly<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-2.jpg\" alt=\"Should require 100% burn-in testing or is sample testing acceptable\" class=\"wp-image-1121\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-2.jpg 960w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-2-600x450.jpg 600w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-2-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-2-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"burn-in-testing\">Burn-in testing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Burn-in is a controlled run (often at elevated stress) to expose&nbsp;<strong>early-life failures<\/strong>\u2014things like marginal solder joints, weak components, flaky connectors, or process escapes that slip past ICT\/FCT. It doesn\u2019t \u201ccreate\u201d reliability. It&nbsp;<strong>screens out<\/strong>&nbsp;weak units before they reach your customer and become RMAs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Where burn-in fits in a modern flow:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>DFM\/DFT<\/strong>\u00a0up front (reduce easy-to-make mistakes)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Process controls<\/strong>\u00a0during SMT and assembly<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>ICT\/FCT<\/strong>\u00a0to verify electrical behavior<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Burn-in \/ ESS<\/strong>\u00a0to catch early-life and intermittent issues<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>OBA<\/strong>\u00a0(outgoing quality audit) to keep the line honest<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want to align burn-in with manufacturing capabilities, browse the production scope here:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/capabilities\/\">Capabilities<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"100-burn-in-screening\">100% burn-in screening<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Teams choose&nbsp;<strong>100% burn-in<\/strong>&nbsp;when one bad unit can ruin the whole party. Think: safety, warranty blowups, brand damage, or mission-critical uptime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>You should seriously consider 100% burn-in when:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>You\u2019re in\u00a0<strong>NPI \/ EVT-DVT<\/strong>\u00a0and still chasing weird intermittent bugs.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Your board has\u00a0<strong>high power density<\/strong>\u00a0(hot spots, tight thermal margins).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You\u2019re dealing with\u00a0<strong>fine-pitch \/ BGA \/ HDI<\/strong>\u00a0where marginal assembly defects can hide.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Your product sits in harsh environments (heat, vibration, humidity) and you can\u2019t afford \u201cinfant mortality\u201d in the field.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Your customer spec or compliance package explicitly calls for screening.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This is also where tight manufacturing discipline matters. A factory that runs consistent controls can make 100% screening feel less painful because it reduces retest loops and \u201cmystery failures.\u201d If your buyer asks how you control escapes, point them to your&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/quality\/\">Quality control<\/a>&nbsp;page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-1.jpg\" alt=\"Should require 100% burn-in testing or is sample testing acceptable\" class=\"wp-image-1120\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-1.jpg 960w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-1-600x450.jpg 600w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-1-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"sample-testing-and-aql-sampling\">Sample testing and AQL sampling<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Sample burn-in can work well\u2014<strong>when you treat it like a process-control tool<\/strong>, not a shortcut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sampling makes sense when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Your production is stable and you\u2019ve already cleaned up early defects.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You\u2019ve got strong\u00a0<strong>traceability by lot<\/strong>, plus quick containment when a sample fails.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Your product can tolerate limited field failures (replaceable modules, controlled installs).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You\u2019re using sampling as an\u00a0<strong>audit<\/strong>\u00a0while relying on ICT\/FCT + SPC to carry most of the load.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The trap is obvious: sampling only works if you have a&nbsp;<strong>clear escalation rule<\/strong>. If a sample fails, you don\u2019t shrug. You quarantine lots, trigger FA (failure analysis), and temporarily step up screening until the root cause is fixed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you support both prototyping and volume builds, keep the narrative consistent: quick-turn doesn\u2019t mean careless, and mass production doesn\u2019t mean blind repetition. That positioning matches a shop that offers&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/services\/pcb-fabrication\/\">PCB fabrication<\/a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/services\/pcb-assembly\/\">PCB assembly<\/a>&nbsp;under one roof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"early-life-failures-infant-mortality-\">Early-life failures (infant mortality)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Burn-in mainly targets the \u201cinfant mortality\u201d slice of the bathtub curve\u2014failures that show up early because something was weak from day one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Common early-life failure drivers in PCBA:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Marginal solder joints<\/strong>\u00a0(voiding, head-in-pillow, insufficient wetting)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Connector intermittents<\/strong>\u00a0(mechanical tolerance stack-ups)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Power path issues<\/strong>\u00a0(hot MOSFETs, stressed inductors, marginal creepage\/clearance design)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Firmware timing edge cases<\/strong>\u00a0that only show up after hours of run time<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Thermal expansion stress<\/strong>\u00a0that reveals borderline assembly workmanship<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s the key: if your dominant risk is early-life issues, burn-in helps. If your dominant risk is&nbsp;<strong>random life failures<\/strong>&nbsp;(component wear-out or long-term drift), burn-in won\u2019t magically fix that. You\u2019ll need better component selection, derating, and reliability testing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"process-maturity-and-npi\">Process maturity and NPI<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Most teams don\u2019t start with sampling. They earn it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;<strong>NPI<\/strong>, you\u2019re still learning:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Which components run hot in real life<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Which layouts amplify noise or coupling<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Which assembly steps create variation (paste, placement, reflow profile, cleaning, coating)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Which test coverage actually matters<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s why many programs use a staged approach:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Prototype\/early builds:<\/strong>\u00a0heavier screening + deeper debug<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Pilot builds:<\/strong>\u00a0100% burn-in while closing Pareto defects<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ramp:<\/strong>\u00a0shift to sample burn-in once yield and FA stabilize<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mass production:<\/strong>\u00a0sample burn-in as an audit, with fast escalation rules<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>If your buyer wants a factory partner for that whole journey\u2014prototype to MP\u2014send them to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/services\/\">Services<\/a>&nbsp;and let them self-qualify.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"environmental-stress-screening-ess-hass-hasa\">Environmental stress screening (ESS), HASS, HASA<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>People mix these terms, so here\u2019s the plain-English version:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>ESS (Environmental Stress Screening):<\/strong>\u00a0screening with environmental stress (temp cycling, vibration, etc.) to catch workmanship issues.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>HASS (Highly Accelerated Stress Screening):<\/strong>\u00a0aggressive screening, usually during ramp, to flush weak builds fast.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>HASA (Highly Accelerated Stress Audit):<\/strong>\u00a0sampling-based audit after the process stabilizes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>You don\u2019t need fancy acronyms to make the decision. You need discipline:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Define failure modes you want to catch<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Pick stress that accelerates those modes without damaging good units<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Decide the screening rate (100% vs sample)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Write down what happens when failures appear (containment + FA + corrective action)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-3.jpg\" alt=\"Should require 100% burn-in testing or is sample testing acceptable\" class=\"wp-image-1119\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-3.jpg 960w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-3-600x450.jpg 600w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-3-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Should-require-100-burn-in-testing-or-is-sample-testing-acceptable-3-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"practical-scenarios-in-pcb-assembly\">Practical scenarios in PCB assembly<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"medical-electronics-pcba\">Medical electronics PCBA<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>If you ship medical boards, your buyer hates surprises. They care about traceability, consistent workmanship, and controlled screening.&nbsp;<strong>100% burn-in<\/strong>&nbsp;often wins early, then selective sampling may follow once data proves stability. For medical-focused builds, you can reference a relevant product category like&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/oem-medical-hdi-pcb-supplier-high-reliability-devices-b2b\/\">medical HDI PCB<\/a>&nbsp;to keep the conversation grounded in real deliverables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"automotive-electronics-control-boards\">Automotive electronics control boards<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Automotive buyers speak in&nbsp;<strong>PPAP, control plans, and \u201cno escape\u201d<\/strong>&nbsp;language. They\u2019ll push hard for robust screening during ramp, especially for power and safety-related control boards. If you\u2019re positioning for that crowd, a page like&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/oem-automotive-electronics-control-pcb-prototype-supplier\/\">automotive electronics control PCB prototype<\/a>&nbsp;makes your burn-in stance feel concrete, not theoretical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"industrial-control-and-embedded-systems\">Industrial control and embedded systems<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Industrial customers want uptime. They don\u2019t want a tech climbing a cabinet at 2 a.m. Burn-in helps when failures are intermittent or thermal-related, especially on multilayer control boards. Sampling can work once the line is stable, but you must keep tight lot control and quick containment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"decision-table-100-burn-in-vs-sample-testing\">Decision table: 100% burn-in vs sample testing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Keyword decision point<\/th><th>Choose&nbsp;<strong>100% burn-in screening<\/strong>&nbsp;when\u2026<\/th><th>Choose&nbsp;<strong>sample testing<\/strong>&nbsp;when\u2026<\/th><th>Practical evidence you should collect<\/th><th>Standards \/ guidance you can cite (no external links)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Product risk level<\/td><td>One field failure is unacceptable (safety, major warranty, brand risk)<\/td><td>Failures are manageable and replacements are controlled<\/td><td>Field return rate trend, criticality analysis<\/td><td>NASA screening guidance (burn-in as screening), reliability handbooks<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Early-life failures<\/td><td>Your FA shows infant mortality patterns<\/td><td>Failures rarely occur early<\/td><td>Time-to-fail distribution, FA categories<\/td><td>MIL-STD-883 burn-in concepts, reliability practice<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Process maturity<\/td><td>NPI \/ ramp, supplier changes, new layout, new BOM<\/td><td>Stable MP with proven yield and stable FA Pareto<\/td><td>Yield stability, defect Pareto, SPC signals<\/td><td>IPC-9592 style approach: 100% early then audit sampling<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Customer\/spec constraints<\/td><td>Contract or compliance requires screening<\/td><td>Spec allows performance-based outgoing quality<\/td><td>Spec review, deviation approvals<\/td><td>MIL-STD \/ customer specs, contractual quality clauses<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Handling and over-stress risk<\/td><td>You can stress without damaging good units<\/td><td>Stress\/handling risks outweigh screening benefit<\/td><td>Damage rates, NTF rate, rework loops<\/td><td>COTS\/handling cautions in space\/hi-rel practice<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Containment capability<\/td><td>You need screening to prevent escapes<\/td><td>You can quarantine fast when a sample fails<\/td><td>Lot traceability, quarantine speed, FA turnaround<\/td><td>ESS\/HASA practices (audit + fast escalation)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"how-to-set-a-burn-in-plan-with-your-pcb-supplier\">How to set a burn-in plan with your PCB supplier<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want this decision to feel clean inside procurement and quality meetings, keep it simple:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Define the objective:<\/strong>\u00a0catch early-life issues, reduce RMAs, protect a launch.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Pick a stress profile that matches your risks:<\/strong>\u00a0thermal soak for power boards, run-time cycles for firmware-heavy devices, load testing for power rails.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Choose the screening rate:<\/strong>\u00a0100% during NPI\/ramp, then sample audit once yields and FA stabilize.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Write the escalation rule:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cIf a sample fails, do X within Y hours.\u201d That rule is the difference between sampling and gambling.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Align it with your manufacturing flow:<\/strong>\u00a0DFM, test coverage, traceability, and outgoing audits.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want a direct line for burn-in requirements, test fixtures, and lot traceability, point readers to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/contact-us\/\">Contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"summary\">Summary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>You don\u2019t need a one-size policy. You need a&nbsp;<strong>risk-based screening strategy<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Use\u00a0<strong>100% burn-in<\/strong>\u00a0when risk is high, the process is still settling, or the customer demands it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Use\u00a0<strong>sample testing<\/strong>\u00a0when your line is mature, your data supports it, and you\u2019ve got fast containment and FA.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>That approach fits OEM\/ODM buyers, EMS teams, design houses, labs, and startups alike\u2014especially when they want quick-turn prototyping today and stable mass production tomorrow.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>100% burn-in catches early failures in high-risk builds. Sample burn-in works after process stability, with clear escalation rules and strong traceability.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1121,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_gspb_post_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[767,770,771,599,769,768],"class_list":["post-1117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-market-trends","tag-burn-in-testing","tag-ess-screening","tag-manufacturing-quality-control","tag-pcb-assembly","tag-reliability-testing","tag-sample-testing"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1117"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1122,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117\/revisions\/1122"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/template01.zehannet.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}